Fabulous Prizes!
A Red coffee mug, Red BU hat, and a Gray Challenging Dogma Shirt! We make it worth your time.
Thank Prof. Siegel for what he didn't say...regarding his role in tobacco control. Interesting grammatical construction.
Showing posts with label Session 11. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Session 11. Show all posts
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Welcome to Session 11
The Doll video! Next up, the Implicit Test.
We need more than two examples of internalized racism.
Not to play the inappropriate stickler, but is there any possibility that young children see this difference as stemming from the treatment they receive from adults? White adults, in a hyper-PC world, treat young black children as pleasantly as possible, not daring to scold another person's child (especially one of another race) whereas they are scolded by people within their own community, who are more likely to be black? They may similarly see reticence on the part of their own parents to scold white children, and therefore unless they are privy to white children being scolded by their white parents, have a limited frame of reference. I can't imagine a white parallel experience, so this seems pretty unlikely, but maybe.
We need more than two examples of internalized racism.
Not to play the inappropriate stickler, but is there any possibility that young children see this difference as stemming from the treatment they receive from adults? White adults, in a hyper-PC world, treat young black children as pleasantly as possible, not daring to scold another person's child (especially one of another race) whereas they are scolded by people within their own community, who are more likely to be black? They may similarly see reticence on the part of their own parents to scold white children, and therefore unless they are privy to white children being scolded by their white parents, have a limited frame of reference. I can't imagine a white parallel experience, so this seems pretty unlikely, but maybe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)